"I think what people mean by "serious" or "realistic" are not referring to the mechanics or the gameplay but rather the style of the game and also the tone of the game. COD is just as arcadey as bulletstorm it's just a question of what kind of paint you put on it. I don't really like that style of game but they're a realistic game. It's not fast paced, there's a lot involved more than just running around shooting dudes.
It's just a fact that Arma II or the Original Operation Flashpoint for the PC are the kinds of things that a realistic shooter is like. That's not even a knock against Bulletstorm or Call of Duty or support for what these games are. You should play Arma II so you know what a realistic shooter looks like. I just read a bunch of people writing about bulletstorm and they all used leads saying that the market today is too crowded with serious and realistic shooters. They are not mainstream, they aren't on consoles. " There are serious and realistic first person shooters. It's like the idiots who constantly compared Call of Duty to Halo 3. People will always say stupid shit, it's best to just let them be. There are small chunks of the spectrum that are heavily populated, and the rest kind of fills with the occasional game here and there. There are games like Duke Nukem, there are games like CoD and Bad Company, there are games like Rainbow six, and there are games like those ones with the AI voices. And generally the grouping is pretty tight. You heal up in a couple of seconds, you move fast as hell for pretty much as long as you want and SOMETIMES FASTER, emptying a 30 round mag on full auto takes like 10 seconds, which is about 3 rounds a second, you magically jump into helicopters and gun people down, and every soldier has a device that calls heavy ordinance down on their enemies, or highlights them on a heads up display map.
"It's either black or white? No grey? OK. Said: " said: " COD is just as arcadey as bulletstorm it's just a question of what kind of paint you put on it.
0 kommentar(er)
